Kevin M. Bell

Biacore AB v. Thermo BioAnalysis, Inc. – Represented Biacore in patent litigation involving biosensors in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Greatbatch Medical, Inc. – Represented Greatbatch in patent litigation regarding valved, peelable/splittable introducers in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Becton Dickinson & Co. v. Tyco Healthcare LP – Represented Becton Dickinson in patent litigation regarding safety needles in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

Ajinomoto Co., Inc. v. Archer-Daniels Midland – Represented Ajinomoto in patent litigation involving methods using recombinant biotechnology to produce amino specific amino acids – threonine and lysine in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

Applera Corp. v. Bio-Rad Labs., MJ Research and Stratagene Corp. – Represented Stratagene in patent litigation involving Real Time qPCR machines in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut.

Benitec Australia, Inc. v. Nucleonics Inc. – Represented Benitec in patent litigation involving RNAi technology in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

Clontech Laboratories, Inc. v. Life Technologies, Inc. (formerly Invitrogen Corp.) – Represented Clontech in a patent false marking case in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

Complete Nutrition v. Vireo Systems and Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska – Represented Complete Nutrition in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.

Digene Corporation v. Ventana Medical System, Inc. and Beckman Coulter, Inc. – Represented Digene in patent litigation involving antibody detection kits and systems directed to human papillomavirus (HPV) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

Enzo Biochem v. Digene Corporation – Represented Digene in patent litigation involving systems and methods for antibody detection of viruses in the U.S. District Court of Delaware.

Flamel Technologies, S.A. v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. – Represented Flamel in ANDA patent litigation involving drug delivery systems in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.

Flamel Technologies, S.A. v. Lupin Limited, et al. – Represented Flamel in ANDA patent litigation involving drug delivery systems in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.

Howard Foundation Holdings Ltd. v. International Vitamin Corp. – Represented Howard Foundation Holdings in patent litigation involving dietary supplements containing mesozeaxanthin in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

Life Technologies, Inc. (formerly Invitrogen Corp.) v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc. – Represented Clontech in patent litigation involving RNase H- Reverse Transcriptase products in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. BPI Sports Holdings, LLC – Represented Natural Alternatives in patent litigation involving dietary/sports supplements containing beta-alanine in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. – Represented Natural Alternatives in patent litigation involving dietary/sports supplements containing beta-alanine in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. Woodbolt Distribution, LLC, GNC Corp., BodyBuilding.com, LLC – Represented Natural Alternatives in patent litigation involving dietary/sports supplements containing beta-alanine in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Pharmavite, LLC, et al. – Represented Purity Products, Inc. in patent litigation involving Glucosamine Sulfate, Chondroitin Sulfate and S-Adenosyl-Methionine in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.

Ogbonna v. USPLABS, LLC, et al. – Represented Natural Alternatives International, Inc. in product liability litigation involving dietary supplements in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas.

Oxford Gene Technology, Ltd. v. Mergen Ltd., Clontech Laboratories, Inc. d/b/a BD Biosciences Clontech, PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Inc. – Represented Clontech in patent litigation involving nucleic acid array products in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

Petito, et al. v. SmartPak Equine, LLC – Represented SmartPak in patent litigation involving equine supplements in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

Sparling, et al. v. Doyle, et al. – Represented Natural Alternatives International, Inc. in product liability litigation involving dietary supplements in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas.

The Original Creatine Patent Company, Ltd. v. Muscletech Research and Development, Inc. – Represented the Original Creatine Patent Company in patent litigation involving dietary/sports supplements containing creatine in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

The Original Creatine Patent Company, Ltd. v. NBTY, Inc. – Represented the Original Creatine Patent Company in patent litigation involving dietary/sports supplements containing creatine in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

The Original Creatine Patent Company, Ltd. v. Optimum Nutrition, Inc. – Represented the Original Creatine Patent Company in patent litigation involving dietary/sports supplements containing creatine in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.