The Impact of U.S. Reciprocal Tariffs on Global Supply Chain

On April 2, 2025, the Trump administration imposed one of the largest set of tariffs in U.S. history, dubbed “Liberation Day.” These so-called reciprocal tariffs are another step in the administration’s broad imposition of tariffs since Inauguration Day 2025. In his first three months in office, the administration imposed a 25% tariff on auto imports, an additional 10% tariff on Chinese imports, a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum, and a 25% tariff on all products from Canada and Mexico not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement.

The tariffs imposed on April 2 were touted as “reciprocal,” matching what other countries charge the United States dollar for dollar, even taking into account non-tariff barriers like value-added taxes and other such measures. However, the administration reportedly used the following calculation to determine tariff rates: the country’s trade deficit divided by its exports to the United States times 1/2.

As announced, a 10% minimum tariff will apply to goods from all countries. Certain trading partners will face higher, “reciprocal tariffs” aimed at penalizing them for their trade barriers. Those taxes on imported goods are calculated on a country-by-country basis, and the levels President Trump announced for some trading partners are substantial: 34% tariffs on China, 26% on India, 25% on South Korea, and 20% on the European Union. Senior administration officials said the 10% worldwide tariffs take effect April 5, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. EDT, and the higher reciprocal tariffs go into effect on April 9, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. EDT.

These new tariffs do not apply to steel, aluminum, automobiles, and auto parts. Rather, the recent tariffs imposed on those goods still apply. In addition, the new tariffs will not apply to Canada and Mexico, although the preexisting steel, aluminum, and auto tariffs do heavily affect those countries. For other goods, the tariffs are additive, meaning they will be imposed in addition to any previous tariffs already in place, unless a specific good is exempt under Section 232 of the Tariffs Act. For example, the new 34% reciprocal tariff rate on Chinese goods will apply in addition to the 20% tariffs already imposed on goods from that country, meaning that Chinese goods are now set to face a 54% tariff rate.

The administration also issued an executive order closing the de minimis exemption that has allowed packages from China and Hong Kong worth less than $800 and shipped directly to a consumer to enter the United States free of duties. From and after 12:01 a.m. EDT on May 2, 2025, such imports would be subject to a duty rate of either 30% of their value or $25 per item, with that rate increasing to $50 per item after June 1, 2025.

Tariff Rates by Country

The list below indicates the specific tariffs based on information currently available to the public.

Country Tariff Rate
China 34%
European Union 20%
Vietnam 46%
Taiwan 32%
Japan 24%
India 26%
South Korea 25%
Thailand 36%
Switzerland 31%
Indonesia 32%
Malaysia 24%
Cambodia 49%
United Kingdom 10%
South Africa 30%
Brazil 10%
Bangladesh 37%
Singapore 10%
Israel 17%
Philippines 17%
Chile 10%
Australia 10%
Pakistan 29%
Turkey 10%
Sri Lanka 44%
Colombia 10%
Peru 10%
Nicaragua 18%
Norway 15%
Costa Rica 10%
Jordan 20%
Dominican Republic 10%
United Arab Emirates 10%
New Zealand 10%
Argentina 10%
Ecuador 10%
Guatemala 10%
Honduras 10%
Madagascar 47%
Myanmar (Burma) 44%
Tunisia 28%
Kazakhstan 27%
Serbia 37%
Egypt 10%
Saudi Arabia 10%
El Salvador 10%
Côte d’Ivoire 21%
Laos 48%
Botswana 37%
Trinidad and Tobago 10%
Morocco 10%
Algeria 30%
Oman 10%
Uruguay 10%
Bahamas 10%
Lesotho 50%
Ukraine 10%
Bahrain 10%
Qatar 10%
Mauritius 40%
Fiji 32%
Iceland 10%
Kenya 10%
Liechtenstein 37%
Guyana 38%
Haiti 10%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 35%
Nigeria 14%
Namibia 21%
Brunei 24%
Bolivia 10%
Panama 10%
Venezuela 15%
North Macedonia 33%
Ethiopia 10%
Ghana 10%
Moldova 31%
Angola 32%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 11%
Jamaica 10%
Mozambique 16%
Paraguay 10%
Zambia 17%
Lebanon 10%
Tanzania 10%
Iraq 39%
Georgia 10%
Senegal 10%
Azerbaijan 10%
Cameroon 11%
Uganda 10%
Albania 10%
Armenia 10%
Nepal 10%
Sint Maarten 10%
Falkland Islands 41%
Gabon 10%
Kuwait 10%
Togo 10%
Suriname 10%
Belize 10%
Papua New Guinea 10%
Malawi 17%
Liberia 10%
British Virgin Islands 10%
Afghanistan 10%
Zimbabwe 18%
Benin 10%
Barbados 10%
Monaco 10%
Syria 41%
Uzbekistan 10%
Republic of the Congo 10%
Djibouti 10%
French Polynesia 10%
Cayman Islands 10%
Kosovo 10%
Curaçao 10%
Vanuatu 22%
Rwanda 10%
Sierra Leone 10%
Mongolia 10%
San Marino 10%
Antigua and Barbuda 10%
Bermuda 10%
Eswatini 10%
Marshall Islands 10%
Saint Pierre and Miquelon 50%
Saint Kitts and Nevis 10%
Turkmenistan 10%
Grenada 10%
Sudan 10%
Turks and Caicos Islands 10%
Aruba 10%
Montenegro 10%
Saint Helena 10%
Kyrgyzstan 10%
Yemen 10%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 10%
Niger 10%
Saint Lucia 10%
Nauru 30%
Equatorial Guinea 13%
Iran 10%
Libya 31%
Samoa 10%
Guinea 10%
Timor-Leste 10%
Montserrat 10%
Chad 13%
Mali 10%
Maldives 10%
Tajikistan 10%
Cabo Verde 10%
Burundi 10%
Guadeloupe 10%
Bhutan 10%
Martinique 10%
Tonga 10%
Mauritania 10%
Dominica 10%
Micronesia 10%
Gambia 10%
French Guiana 10%
Christmas Island 10%
Andorra 10%
Central African Republic 10%
Solomon Islands 10%
Mayotte 10%
Anguilla 10%
Cocos (Keeling) Islands 10%
Eritrea 10%
Cook Islands 10%
South Sudan 10%
Comoros 10%
Kiribati 10%
São Tomé and Príncipe 10%
Norfolk Island 29%
Gibraltar 10%
Tuvalu 10%
British Indian Ocean Territory 10%
Tokelau 10%
Guinea-Bissau 10%
Svalbard and Jan Mayen 10%
Heard and McDonald Islands 10%
Réunion 37%

World leaders swiftly condemned the tariff announcement and threatened swift trade retaliation. Officials from Australia, Ireland, and elsewhere argued the move would harm international trade, disrupt relationships, and strain domestic industries. Critics also noted that developing countries would be disproportionately impacted, citing potential negative impacts on global economic stability. The administration defended the tariffs by framing them as an effort to bring foreign manufacturing back to the U.S. and offset the national debt. However, economists warned that tariffs may spark inflation, hurt consumers, and potentially lead to further market volatility.

Key Recommendations for Businesses Addressing Tariff Changes

Supply Chain Risk Assessment

  • Identify current suppliers in high-tariff regions and evaluate their impact on your overall cost structure.
  • Develop contingency plans, including alternative or domestic suppliers, to reduce exposure to future tariff escalations.
  • Update contracts and evaluate insurance coverage to ensure you have adequate protection in the event of supply disruptions.

HTS Code Review

  • Verify that you are applying the correct Harmonized Tariff Schedule (“HTS”) codes to your products.
  • Evaluate whether reclassification of certain parts or products may yield lower duty rates, while still adhering to all compliance requirements.
  • Maintain thorough documentation to substantiate HTS classifications and facilitate smooth customs clearances.

Country of Origin Analysis

  • Perform a comprehensive audit of the production process to confirm the accuracy of any country-of-origin claims.
  • Investigate whether shifting a portion of manufacturing or assembly to a different locale could offer more favorable duty treatment.
  • Keep robust records that detail each stage of production, enabling you to respond quickly to audits or inquiries from customs authorities.

By proactively conducting a supply chain risk assessment, performing a careful HTS code review, and conducting a country-of-origin analysis, companies can better insulate themselves from sudden tariff hikes and remain adaptable in a rapidly evolving trade environment. Such diligence not only helps secure current operations but also sets the stage for long-term resilience in global markets.

For further guidance on how these changes may impact your business, please contact AGG partners Allison Raley and Mike Burke. AGG will continue to monitor developments and will update as needed.